Many times I see press releases that look very nice – perhaps like a blog or product offering.  Technically very well-written, it has long quotes and helps push a product – perfect for a brochure or an ad purchase.  But without a sense of news value to interest a journalist, these releases are destined for the graveyard of the client’s web site “news section,” where it might be seen by a few hundred people.
 
Why is press coverage so important?  Because while reaching 200 demographically people by way of a LinkedIn post is great, reaching 20,000 through an article or mention in a demographically compatible trade publication is better.  And reaching 200,000 through an article in the Harvard Business Review is better than 20,000.  And reaching 800,000 through an article or mention in the Wall Street Journal is…well, you get the point.
 
Generating positive press coverage is extremely powerful in creating and shaping awareness.  Then taking this coverage and pushing that messaging through social media, multiplies the number of targets reached.  And you are having a third party talk about you, delivering much more credibility.
 
But here’s the trick: it is very difficult to get the press to write about you or include you in stories.  We surveyed more than 100 journalists around the world at major newspapers, radio and TV stations, magazines and news wire services.  While there were slight variations based on region on some issues, there was one unanimous finding: they don’t think the press releases and pitch materials that PR people send them are very good.  In fact, 90% said that what they receive is deleted after only reading the email subject line – never opening the email.  The reason?  75% said that PR professionals do not know what makes something newsworthy and of interest to the press.

There are two required skills in generating press coverage: knowing what makes something “newsworthy,” and being creative enough to make something newsworthy when it isn’t.

And it is very difficult to know what makes something newsworthy unless you have worked as a journalist. Crisis PR expert Michael Sitrick (Exxon Valdez oil spill, Enron, Theranos, etc.) tries to only hire former journalists at his firm: “It’s easier to teach journalists P.R. than to teach publicists what news judgment is.”

So when evaluating a potential PR provider, do this:

1. Look at case studies of where the client came with a need to reach a specific audience and how that need was filled.  Remember, the greater number of demographically compatible people reached, the better. 
2. Ask to see situations where creative thinking was needed to create a news story when one was not there or they met initial lack of interest.
3. Make sure the person who managed the examples they are showing is still there and will be your account lead, as you are hiring a person, not a company.

Mike Tyson was right when he talked about strategy.  He said: "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth."  Meaning a plan is worthless without the ability to execute on it.  Those who execute better than others generally win.
 
For example, everybody knows the strategy involved with hitting a golf ball.  But that by itself does not mean you will win a tournament or even break par.  You must execute the swing.
 
I'm am not saying that strategy is not an important – it is.  It is the critical starting point to every communications program.  Before I start on a PR project, I give the client a grid map asking them to identify all the audiences they want to reach, the current perception and desired perceptions for each audience, competitors in the space (and their messaging) and media outlets they feel are most impactful to them.
 
But this strategy is not the end point, it is just the beginning.  Too many people get lost in taking a victory lap around the process – they celebrate with PowerPoints, videos and graphics, rather than focusing on the results. 
 
With PR, you are generally trying to do one of three things: 1) create positive awareness for a person, product, company or cause, through means other than advertising; 2) maintain current perceptions or increase awareness around current perceptions; 3) change perceptions (crisis situations).
 
In each case, you start with the strategy and messaging grid.  But this is only 25% of the game.  The remaining 75% is the heavy lifting in reaching the greatest number of demographically compatible targets with the desired messaging and getting them to believe it.
 
Reaching 500 demographically people through a LinkedIn post is better than reaching 100.  Reaching 20,000 through an article or mention in a demographically compatible trade publication is better than 400.  Reaching 200,000 through an article in the Harvard Business Review is better than 20,000.  And reaching 800,000 through an article or mention in The Wall Street Journal is…well, you get the point.

If you are not careful, branding can be like quicksand – particularly when you create an image that you can’t live up to.  Far too many businesses fall in love with aspirational positioning, and in the process of chasing a new look, lose touch with the here and now.  It’s like there are no mirrors in the office and people believe what they want to believe.

Think of it this way: you are single and looking to date more.  So you join one of the online match making sites and post as your profile picture, not yourself, but a picture of George Clooney.  I can virtually guarantee an overflow of first dates, but can almost be 100% sure that the rate of second dates will fall dramatically. 

​I think the same danger exists when companies succumb to the sunshine talk from advertising, branding and PR agencies in developing new campaigns.  The agency may be well-intentioned – or looking to do whatever it takes to land/keep the business – but at some point, someone needs to hang up a mirror in the office.

Businesses spent $70 billion on Google AdWords purchases and SEO tools last year.  And all of it is really wasted money if your website can’t hold these visitors once they arrive.  It’s really no different than doing loads of advertising and promotions to get buyers to come into your brick and mortar store, only to then have them leave in ten seconds without looking around or buying anything.

I am not saying that you shouldn’t invest in SEO and AdWords enhancers.  But only after you’ve got your website developed properly -- most importantly, your landing page.
 
You have 10 seconds to get your value proposition across to keep your visitor from leaving
Microsoft Research analyzed data from "a popular web browser plug-in," looking at page-visit length for 205,873 different web pages which totaled 10,000 visits.  One key finding was that decisions to keep looking into the website were made in approximately 10 seconds.

In our working with firms on website redesign, the number one issue is getting their landing page to clearly communicate their value proposition and look appealing, to get visitors to go deeper into the site.  Unless they are a repeat customer, they most likely have found you by word of mouth, reading about you in the press or online, or from a search engine.

A large majority of the time the visitor has found you because they have a need.  It could be a leaky roof, a broken water heater, a car in need of repair, cosmetic surgery or an IRS audit.  They want to know how will you take away their pain and what are the differentiators to using you rather than a competitor.

​Ten seconds – that’s it.  Does your web landing page do this?  Remember, you never do get a second chance to make a good first impression.  Even after spending a lot on SEO and AdWords.

As attorneys move beyond providing just legal advice to being a trusted advisor to their clients, an area where they can add great value is in another court: the court of public opinion.  According to the Wall Street Journal, a survey of CEOs found reputation damage as their number one strategic risk.

Attorneys have seen how a client’s reputation can be severely damaged long before setting foot inside a courtroom.  Arthur Andersen was recognized as the leading global accounting firm, the gold standard in the industry.  But three months after the onset of the Enron crisis, it was out of business. Not because of a legal proceeding or a trial -- that would come months later and ironically, clear them of charges -- but because of mass client defections driven by reputational damage from negative press coverage.
 
In working with the press, here are ten tips to follow:

1. Establish trusted relationships with the press before you need them  -- 100% of crisis communications management is the story you tell in your defense.  And though social media is an impactful communications tools, the majority of opinion forming is still carried out through traditional news outlets such as CNN, Reuters, the Wall Street Journal, CNBC, Bloomberg and the Associated Press.  Get to know journalists covering your clients before a crisis hits.
2. Utilize all the messaging tools -- The level of trust you have built by establishing journalist relationships will allow you to utilize two very powerful crisis messaging tools (if needed): working the story “on background” and “off the record.”
3. Develop talking points  -- These are your three main points that will serve as your defense in court and will be used in reputation management with the press, influencers, your client’s employees and your client’s clients.  Try to keep them to no more than three, given the attention span of the average person.
4. No comment means more space for other side -- Most journalists need 300 - 500 words to fill out a story.  If you don’t give them copy (or give them additional content “on background” or “off the record”) they will most likely fill that void with commentary from a less than friendly source.  At the very least, give them a reactive media statement that tracks with your defense strategy.
5. The first version reported by the press is the most important -- This is particularly true if the story is being reported by a news wire service such as Reuters, the Associated Press or Bloomberg.  Yes, these news wires will run follow up stories if you have not responded in the first story, but the press outlets that use their copy (Daily papers, TV news, web sites, etc.) will have run the first version they see.   Plus, public opinion starts to formulate and hardens quickly and it is harder to change sentiment later. 
6. Get it all out and make it a one day story -- Be truthful and get everything out and move on.  Don’t deceive the journalist (directly or indirectly) as you may win the battle, but will have lost the war in losing trust that you have been trying to build. If you don’t get it all out, you run the risk of further stories as issues are uncovered – remember, many times a plaintiff attorney or disgruntled party are actively feeding the journalist information.
7. Reactive media statements need to be short and to the point -- Try to keep them to one sentence to force the journalist to use the entire sentence.  Remember, the journalist does not have to run the entire reactive statement, so if you give them three or four rambling sentences, they could use only one and your overall messaging strategy would be weakened.
8. Don’t repeat the negative question --  Never repeat a reporter’s negative question in your response.  For example, if the reporter asks “Did Sam Brooks cook the books?” do not say “Sam Brooks did not cook the books,” because you will have a headline that reads: “Sam Brooks attorney denies that they cooked the books.” 
9. Don’t say your client's name --  Whereas we want their name out there as much as possible in a positive situation (using the actual name instead of “we” “us” etc). in a negative situation we want pronouns and no name usage.  Who wants their picture at the accident site?
10. Keep it simple – Keep your reactive statement, talking points and communications brief, simple and understandable to the common man.  It is not a legal pleading.

​It was the spring of 1987 and I was about two years into my PR career, having transitioned from working as an investigative political news producer at Channel 2 News in Chicago (CBS-TV News).
 
I was working my way up the totem pole at Janet Diederichs and Associates, a mid-sized Chicago PR agency, and was given the opportunity to pitch my first account, The W. Clement Stone Foundation.
 
I developed a plan, pitched the work and beat out three of the largest agencies for the $30,000 project.  The objective was to raise awareness and nominations for Stone’s “Endow a Dream Award” – the recipient would receive $100,000 to donate to any charity – even their own.
 
We created an 800 phone line to expedite submissions for the award.  And despite the large stature of W. Clement Stone in Chicago, I knew that his name would not hold marquee status with journalists in New York and Los Angeles.  So we did some research and found that Stone, by virtue of his giving away $400 million to charity at that point, was the greatest living philanthropist.  Only Rockefeller had given away more money to charity over a lifetime. 
 
We were able to use the title of greatest living philanthropist to good effect, arranging appearances on the Larry King Show, Phil Donahue Show, Today Show and interviews with Parade Magazine, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Associated Press and others.  We increased nominations ten-fold over the previous year, found our award recipient and presented the award with President Ronald Reagan in the White House Oval Office.
 
After the award, I kept working with Mr. Stone, helping to promote his foundation.
 
While setting up a media tour of Los Angeles, I called Stone’s office to work out scheduling.  When I told his assistant that I wanted Stone to appear on the Michael Jackson show on KABC radio, she asked if this was Michael Jackson, the singer.  At first I thought she was joking, as it had been only a couple of years since “Thriller” was released and Jackson was the most famous entertainer in the world.
 
When I told her no, she said “you know he calls over here to talk with Mr. Stone – he’s a big fan of Mr. Stone.”
 
I must admit that in retrospect, I was setting my sights to low, when I asked to her see if we could get a photo op with Jackson and Stone while we were in Los Angeles.  She told me that she would check.
 
A few days later she called back and said that Jackson would love to get together, but over dinner.  When I asked at what restaurant, she said it would be at Jackson’s home in Encino.
 
Now when I worked at the CBS-TV News affiliate in Chicago, I had gotten used to being around famous people.  My boss, Walter Jacobson, was a celebrity TV journalist in Chicago in his own right, and he would also interview celebrities coming through town, which allowed me to meet Meryl Streep, Paul Newman and Jimmy Carter.  But this was different.
 
Stone and I traveled separately to LA and I arrived first at Jackson’s home at 6 pm.  Jackson was not there yet, and I was told by his assistant, that he was at the studio working on the Thriller album sequel, “Bad.”
 
At no time in the run up to the dinner – or while at the house – did Stone know who Jackson was.  His intent was merely to talk to someone who had read his books and wanted to discuss positive thinking.  The only time I think Clement Stone had any idea as to how big Michael Jackson was, was when he saw the picture in the waiting lobby of Michael Jackson with President Reagan.
 
After about 30 minutes, Michael Jackson finally arrived.   I was surprised at how small and frail he was, and his skin had a wax like quality similar to a burn victim.
 
He was very nice and pleasant and enjoyable talk with, and much smarter than I anticipated.  Before dinner, he took us on a tour of the house which included an arcade game room and his bedroom, which was interesting in that there were stuffed dolls on his bed, including the seven dwarfs. 
 
We finally finished the house tour - which wasn't what I would consider to be extravagant by North Shore Chicago standards -- and sat down to dinner.  Jackson had his private cook come out and serve us and we spent the next two hours talking about Clement Stone's philosophy on positive thinking.  Jackson was particularly interested in Napoleon Hill and Thomas Edison.
 
After dinner Michael took us on a tour of his backyard and then took us to a room above the garage behind the home, which was his dance studio.  This is where he worked out all his dance routines – not sure this is where the moonwalk was perfected!
 
He had a polaroid camera and would take pictures of himself and his guests and post it on a bulletin board in the dance room.  As we were guests, he had his assistant take one of us together and I assume it was up there for a number years.  If you look closely at the picture below, you can see Barbra Streisand, John Travolta, Fred Astaire and other celebrities who visited Jackson’s dance studio.
 
It was now about 10 pm and it was time to call it a night, so we headed out to say our goodbyes and drove back to the hotel.
 
Obviously, it was hard to sleep that night, still pumped over the dream like experience.
 
***
 
I kept working with Mr. Stone.  In his true positive thinking, entrepreneurial style, encouraged me to start my own PR practice, with him as my first client.